In today’s world finding a sculpted body with toned muscles has become quite easy with the help of advanced technology. Recently, fat reduction treatments have had quite a lot of demand. Some of the premium treatments are Emsculpt and CoolSculpting and both have shaped and toned body promises. Nonetheless, each treatment has its peculiar method, and it is vital to comprehend the differences so that one can choose the method that suits their needs the best. In the article below we analyze the key differences between Emsculpt and CoolSculpting with an emphasis on their benefits, costs, and what one should expect during and after the treatments are done.
How Emsculpt and CoolSculpting Work
Emsculpt and CoolSculpting may both be household names in the field of fat reduction, however, their technological approach is completely different from one another.
With the aid of High-Intensity Focused Electromagnetic (HIFEM) technology, Emsculpt is able to burn fat and build muscle all at the same time. With the use of Emsculpt, fat cells are targeted, and while that is happening, High-Intensity Focused Electromagnetic technology is stimulating muscle contractions, aiding with muscle building. Emsculpt helps in burning fat in addition to toning muscles, and for this reason, it is different from the other fat reduction options. With the aid of Emsculpt, an individual can achieve fat reduction as well as contouring at the same time. The muscle contractions during the procedure are at levels impossible to reach when exercising.
Unlike other options, CoolSculpting’s approach employs cryolipolysis, which gets specific portions of cellulite frostbitten. When the blood flow to those areas is reduced, the fat cells liquefy and thaw, streaming into the circulatory system in the weeks that follow. This procedure does not impact muscle development or growth, so while the physique is sculpted, the muscle will also grow during the process. The procedure freezes the fat cells to a temperature at which the physical body is able to destroy them.
Knowing how each device functions gives you the necessary information needed in selecting the procedure that is most suited for your results.
Advantages of Emsculpt compared to CoolSculpting
Both methods work, but which one you select should depend on your objectives.
For people wanting to enhance muscle while removing fat at the same time, the Emsculpt device is most suitable for them. Abdominal muscles, the arms, and thighs will respond very well to this treatment. Emsculpt offers the dual benefit of attacking both fat and muscle reserves. The treatment is simple, fast, and non-invasive, therefore it can be done during lunch breaks. So if you are busy, this is the best option. Most importantly, Emsculpt’s effectiveness does not stop at improving general appearance, as it increases physical performance as well.
Users wishing to get rid of these localized fat deposits without impacting the existing muscle mass, will find that CoolSculpting matches their needs perfectly. If your goal is reduction of fat instead of toning muscles, then CoolSculpting is probably your best choice. It is especially useful for areas with persistent fat like love handles, the waist, and the flanks. CoolSculpting, like Emsculpt, has no benefits in muscle growth development, but can provide significant fat loss with only a couple of treatments. With its specific approach to fat cell freezing, CoolSculpting is done so that those who want to target problem areas will be well serviced.
In the end, whether to go for Emsculpt or CoolSculpting, depends on a bilateral approach where fat reduction is the ultimate goal and muscle defining is secondary.
What is the Difference In Costs
In planning for a fat reduction treatment, it is very important to consider the cost. The Emsculpt vs CoolSculpting price differs based on the area of treatment, number of sessions and the clinic’s location.
Emsculpt has the highest price points, ranging from $750 to $1,500 per session. Many people choose to undergo multiple sessions of emsculpt body sculpting since it targets both fat and muscle, resulting in better outcomes. The price may be justified for muscle toning, especially in cases where someone wishes to enhance their contours further. Emsculpt has its perks, especially for those wishing to sculpt their bodies with defined effects, hence the price is well catered for.
CoolSculpting is generally cheaper with prices ranging from $600 to $1,200 per session, depending on the targeted area. The patient may have to undergo several sessions to achieve the final results, but it is cheaper than emsculpt as it only focuses on fat, focusing a budget on someone who does not wish to sculpt the body. Budget friendly treatments can always be adjusted, depending on the patient’s expectations.
In the end, those looking to balance muscle toning and fat loss in a cost-friendly option may benefit from emsculpt affordable sessions in the long run. CoolSculpting could provide a quicker fix for those that wish to maintain a lean physique without needing to change their budget too much.
Recovery Time and Treatment Duration
Even though both are non-invasive procedures, each procedure is distinct with regards to duration and recovery time.
Each session of Emsculpt treatment takes no longer than half an hour, and as a bonus, you won’t have to rest afterwards. That’s right, once the treatment is done, most patients can get on with their daily activities without any disruption. Generally, patients feel slight muscle soreness after the Emsculpt session, which is quite similar to the feeling one gets after having worked out intensively. But the soreness usually passes within 48 hours. The soreness is often considered brief and is an indication that muscle use has been stimulated beyond the threshold limits of ordinary exercise.
As for CoolSculpting, the duration can be stretched over a period of 35 to 60 minutes depending on the region being treated. Similar to Emsculpt, patients don’t have to take a break to recover afterwards which is a huge plus. However, like with other treatments, some patients may notice mild redness, inflammation, and in rare cases, some aching in the area being treated. These side effects are usually self-limiting, and normal activities can be resumed immediately after the treatment. While CoolSculpting does not stimulate muscle soreness, it likely requires more sessions compared to Emsculpt for similar results.
Both treatments are low-maintenance, easy to recover from, however, Emsculpt might feel more labor intensive, whereas CoolSculpting has the benefit of being less physically intensive.
Selecting The Most Appropriate Procedure For Fat Reduction In Your Case
Your selection from Emsculpt and CoolSculpting comes down to what you want to achieve. Depending on your goals, if you wish to tone and sculpt your muscles while reducing fat, then Emsculpt is the best option. As for your secondary goals, if it’s reducing stubborn fat without increasing muscle mass, then CoolSculpting is your best bet. Also, the difference in pricing alongside the area of treatment that you have in mind will enable you to make a more informed choice.
As a beauty machine distributor, it’s crucial to offer both options, as each treatment appeals to different client needs. With the rise in the non-invasive treatment phenomenon, with Emsculpt and CoolSculpting, it’s easier for you to provide services to more clients. Educating yourself and your clients on each treatment’s specific value is essential to guiding them toward good decisions.
All in all, both Emsculpt and CoolSculpting have proven to be efficient fat reduction systems. Irrespective of which method you choose, whether fat reduction with CoolSculpting or muscle toning with Emsculpt, considering your target budget, treatment goals and the results you desire will determine what is appropriate for you. Both options will help you achieve your body contouring goals.
Also Read-Winter Fence Care: How to Protect Your Fence in Cold Weather